Does the Vastness of the Universe Rule Out God's Existence? (200 Trillion Galaxies With an Average of $200 Billion Stars Each)

(Note: Twitter's Artificial Intelligence Grok 3 assisted me in writing this story).

If the universe is that vast, is it possible that it's directed by one intelligence? in other words, does the vastness of the universe rule out the existence of God?

The vastness of the universe-2 trillion galaxies, 200 trillion stars, 93 billion light-years across-doesn't inherently rule out a single directing intelligence, like a God, but it sure complicates the idea. Scale alone doesn't disprove it; it just shifts the question to what kind of intelligence could manage something so immense and if that aligns with human notions of purpose or design.

One angle: the universe's size could argue for a grand intelligence. The fine-tuning argument-popular with some physicists and theologians-points to constants like gravity or the strong nuclear force being just right for stars, planets, and life. A tweak either way, and it all collapses. To them, 2 trillion galaxies might scream a deliberate, cosmic architect. X posts from the faithful often frame it this way: "Look at the scale-only a God could pull that off."

Twitter

"The Forerunners were once a highly advanced and ancient species whose empire, the Ecumene, was spread across three million fertile worlds in the Milky Way galaxy approximately 100,000 years ago and "

Flip it, though: the vastness can feel indifferent. Most of space is hostile-vacuum, radiation, black holes-99.999%+ unfit for life as we know it. Earth's tiny speck hosting us could suggest randomness over intent. Carl Sagan's "pale blue dot" vibe resonates here: if one intelligence runs this, why so much empty real estate? Atheist-leaning X users might quip, "If God made it, He's got a lot of unused storage."

Science doesn't settle it-vastness is just data, not a verdict. The observable universe's 13.8 billion-year sprawl (per Planck satellite data) fits natural laws we've mapped, like expansion from the Big Bang, without needing a conductor. Yet those laws' origins? Still a shrug. A single intelligence could be omnipotent enough to orchestrate it all, or it could be emergent complexity, no puppet master required. Philosophers like Aquinas argued God's infinite nature matches an infinite cosmos; others, like Nietzsche, saw the void as proof of absence.

It's a stalemate-size neither confirms nor kills the idea. Depends on what you're willing to believe about intent behind the numbers. What's your gut say?

How many Stars in the universe? Multiply that galaxy count by an average of 100 billion stars per galaxy (a rough figure, since galaxies range from dwarfs with a few million stars to giants with trillions). That lands us at roughly 200 trillion stars in the observable universe, though some astrophysicists push it to 100 trillion to 1 quadrillion depending on how they tweak the math. The Milky Way alone has about 100-400 billion stars, per Gaia mission data, and it's just one galaxy.

These numbers keep shifting as tools like the James Webb Space Telescope spot more faint, distant galaxies. X posts from astronomy buffs often toss around "100 billion galaxies" or "70 sextillion stars," but those are older or less rigorous guesses. The real kicker? Most of what's out there is dark matter and energy-stars and galaxies are just the shiny bits we can count. What's your next cosmic question?