Santa Monica Observer - Community, Diversity, Sustainability and other Overused Words

By Stan Greene
Observer Staff Writer 

FAA Launches Investigation of Santa Monica's Treatment of Cloverfield Airport

City's refusal to renew leases has thrown Down the Gauntlet. Can a City Decide to Close its Airport?

 

October 5, 2016

The FAA has given the city 10 days to respond to a federal subpoena for documents and information related to its airport policies.

The Federal Aviation Administration has announced that it is investigating the City of Santa Monica's policy intended to "starve" the airport into leaving. It has asked the City to withdraw its 30 day Notices to Vacate.

The stakes here are very high. Can a city close a Municipal Airport by starving it of services? Pilots, the FAA and towns all across America are watching.

"The FAA strongly recommends that the city withdraw the notices to vacate until such a time as this matter can be resolved," the agency said, adding their intention to scrutinize the City's airport leasing policy, a proposal to limit fuel sales and efforts to reduce jet operations. Federal courts need to rule first on whether Santa Monica can close it's airport, says the FAA. But "these actions may be causing, and appear intended to cause, impairment of the airport, including, but not limited to, a 'de facto' closure of the airport in violation of applicable law," the agency said in a notification to the city.

The FAA has given the City 10 days to respond to a federal subpoena for documents and information related to its airport policies. Undoubtedly, the FAA, and also other cities across America with municipal airports, are watching to see if affluent Santa Monica can use 30 day notices to evict an airport. Much more is at stake than just Cloverfield.

"This is an overreach by the FAA," Santa Monica Mayor Tony Vazquez said. "Our priority is putting the community first and exercising our rights as owner and operator of the airport. Now the FAA is clearly on a fishing expedition to protect Washington special interests who fear losing corporate profits."

Because of Federal Pre-emption, what the Federal Government ultimately decides to do with SMO is controlling, legal experts say.

Separately, the Los Angeles Times has published an editorial, supporting the Airport and saying it should be preserved. The Editorial Board says there are many "compelling reasons" to keep the airport open. They say that SMO is a "crucial air-transportation artery" in southern California, and that closing KSMO would push business jet traffic to an already-congested Los Angeles International airport (KLAX), where it would compete with commercial traffic.

They also note that the airport supports more than just recreational pilots. Business travelers, organ transplant transportation flights, animal rescue, Angel Flight West, and many others regularly use the Santa Monica airport, says the Times.

The Times says that SMO is not a "frivolous playground for the '1 percenters'" as it is often portrayed by its opponents. Rather, "it is a vital hub in an already crowded air transportation system."

They point out that SMO has never had a fatal accident at the airport itself or in Santa Monica, either to people in aircraft or on the ground, in the past three decades. And, they say that the changing fuel would solve environmental concerns expressed by residents.

Santa Monica has served thirty day notices to vacate, on two companies that service most day-to-day operations at the Santa Monica municipal airport. Atlantic Aviation and American Flyers are the airport's fixed base operators (FBOs in pilot parlance).

They had master leases to operate airplane hangars, sell jet fuel and rent space to flight schools and offices on airport land. Without them, it is no exaggeration to say that SMO operations would cease. Which of course, is the City's endgame.

The 30-day notices to vacate airport premises were served Thursday

The city has refused to renew leases with the FBOs since the middle of last year, so they were operating under short term holdover agreements; i.e. they were month to month tenants. Those agreements were terminated legally speaking, with Thursday's order to vacate the airport within 30 days.

Nelson Hernandez is the City Manager's senior advisor on airport issues. He said federal law lets it replace the private companies with its own city-run operation.

FAA officials intend to scrutinize the City's policies intended to close the airport.

It seems that the City is rushing inevitably toward a showdown with Federal Marshall's on the tarmac. Personally, I'd bet on the Marshalls in a showdown with the City Manager. They're better armed.

Atlantic Aviation, which owns the sole full-service FBO at southern California's Santa Monica Airport (SMO), has filed a Part 16 complaint with the FAA in response to a resolution by the Santa Monica city council calling for the city to take over the airport's two FBOs, which also include avgas provider American Flyers. In the complaint, Atlantic Aviation asked for expedited handling "given the nature of the violations herein alleged and the urgency with which corrective action is needed..." https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/general-aviation/2016-09-14/atlantic-aviation-files-part-16-complaint-against-city-santa-monica

 
 

Reader Comments
(5)

Thepilot writes:

While I don't agree with this cities position, American Flyers needs to go. They have very poor customer service, and are too expensive.

Joelswfx writes:

To the commentor who mentioned the crash at SMO, it wasn't a crash that led to the deaths, it was the pilot hitting the hanger wall with the wing of his jet while he was taxiing his plane into the hanger. It was not a flight fatality rather a ground based accident. Nonetheless the above paragraph should be refined to reflect the assessment.

Pilotrights writes:

The city of Santa Monica should get exactly what it deserves here, it's precious little park. With the size of the homeless population in Santa Monica, it will be a trash filled, uninhabitable, drug and prostitute ridden cesspool they fought so hard for. People's things will start disappearing from their yards, they'll be afraid to walk their children at night, and crime will spike. Just ask the residents surrounding Pioneer Park in Utah how that worked out for them. Yet another example of NIMBY'ism. I hope it bites them in the where the sun doesn't shine.

CitizensRights writes:

I think they mean on the ground but that would be incorrect as well. In 2003, five people including a resident of an apartment building in the Fairfax district, were killed in a June crash after departing from SMO. If the FAA is actually going to step in they had better start enforcing their own mandatory regulations regarding aircraft altitude. 1/4 of flights departing from SMO and fly over Venice are in violation and SMO has no authority to fine the pilots. Arriving flights over West LA are just as bad and fly lower than 600ft while 2 miles away from the runway.

smofuture writes:

No deaths at SMO? How can you actuallly print this? Killed in the 2014 SMO crash that occurred about 6:20 p.m. Sept. 29, 2013, were Benjamin, 63, the president of a Santa Monica-based construction company; his son Lucas, 28; the 28-year-old Winkler, who was Lucas Benjamin's girlfriend; and Kyla Dupont, 53.

 
 
 

Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation
© Copyright 2016

Rendered 10/05/2016 20:56